4.8 Article

Performance improvement of phenyl acetate as propylene carbonate-based electrolyte additive for lithium ion battery by fluorine-substituting

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 267, Issue -, Pages 182-187

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.073

Keywords

Lithium ion battery; Propylene carbonate-based electrolyte; 4-Fluorophenyl acetate; Solid electrolyte interphase; Graphite

Funding

  1. joint project of National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [U1134002, 10351063101000001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21003054, 21273084]
  4. key project of Science and Technology in Guangdong Province [2011A010801001]
  5. scientific research project of DEGP [20130CXDA013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenyl acetate (PA) is more stable and much cheaper than vinylene carbonate (VC), a commercial electrolyte additive for graphite anode of lithium ion battery, but its performance needs to be improved. In this paper, we report a new additive, 4-fluorophenyl acetate (4-FPA), which results from the fluorine-substituting of PA. The properties of the formed solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) by 4-FPA are investigated comparatively with PA by molecular energy level calculation, cyclic voltammetry, charge-discharge test, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. It is found that the SEI formed by 4-FPA is more protective than PA, resulting in the improved cyclic stability of lithium ion battery: the capacity retention of LiFePO4/graphite cell after 90 cycles is 92% for 4-FPA but only 84% for PA. The fluorine in 4-FPA makes it more reducible than PA and the fluorine-containing reduction products of 4-FPA are incorporated into the SEI which contributes to the improved performance. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available