4.8 Article

Ultra-thin polytetrafluoroethene/Nafion/silica composite membrane with high performance for vanadium redox flow battery

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 272, Issue -, Pages 113-120

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.060

Keywords

Polytetrafluoroethene; Nafion; Silica; Vanadium redox flow battery

Funding

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2013BQ002]
  2. Harbin Institute of Technology
  3. Weihai City [2013DXGJ15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultra-thin and high performance polytetrafluoroethene (PTFE)/Nafion/silica composite membrane has been successfully prepared by solution casting and sol gel method for all vanadium redox flow battery (VRB). Thickness of similar to 25 mu m polytetrafluoroethene/Nafion (P/N) membrane is first prepared by impregnating porous PTFE membrane with Nafion solution, and then the P/N membrane is immersed in tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) solution to prepare PTFE/Nafion/silica (P/N/S) composite membranes. The chemical structures of membranes are investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), which prove that the Nafion resin and silica are well impregnated in PTFE membrane. The water uptake, proton conductivity, vanadium permeability and VRB single cell tests of the composite membrane are also investigated in detail. At 80 mA cm(-2), coulombic efficiency, voltage efficiency and energy efficiency of the VRB with P/N/S-7 (7 wt.% SiO2 in P/N/S) membrane are 93.9%, 87.2% and 81.9%, respectively. Furthermore, the self-discharge rate of the VRB with P/N/S membrane is much slower than that of the VRB with P/N membrane, which indicates that the membrane has good vanadium block ability. Fifty cycles charge discharge test proves that the P/N/S membrane is very stable and possesses high chemical stability under the strong acid solutions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available