4.8 Article

Electrochemical evaluation of sulfur poisoning in a methane-fuelled solid oxide fuel cell: Effect of current density and sulfur concentration

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 272, Issue -, Pages 776-785

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.125

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cell; Internal reforming; Sulfur poisoning; Ni/ScYSZ anode; Methane; Current density

Funding

  1. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Ni/ScYSZ based SOFC was tested at 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0 (OCV) A cm(-2) in methane fuel containing 0 - 100 ppm H2S. Analysis of cell voltage loss during short-term H2S poisoning showed that SOFC performance loss was generally larger at higher current loads. Separating the effect of H2S on catalytic reforming and electrochemical activity by evaluating the relevant area specific resistances and charge transfer processes based on impedance spectroscopy revealed that the poisoning of electrochemical activity was not dependent on current density. Two major anode processes were significantly affected by the presence of H2S in the fuel; the lower frequency mass transfer/fuel reforming processes and higher frequency charge transfer/triple phase boundary (TPB) processes. At high current densities (0.5 and 1 A cm(-2)), mass transfer/fuel reforming processes were the most sensitive to sulfur poisoning. At OCV, the effect of sulfur was less pronounced on mass transfer/fuel reforming processes but quite significant on the charge transfer/TPB processes. Overall, sulfur related performance loss was more severe at the highest current density (1 A cm(-2)), due to the deactivation of catalytic fuel reforming reactions in the anode, leading to less available fuel and a higher fuel utilization. All poisoning effects were reversible after removing H2S from the fuel. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available