4.8 Article

Characterization of large format lithium ion battery exposed to extremely high temperature

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 272, Issue -, Pages 457-467

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.094

Keywords

Lithium ion battery; Thermal runaway; High temperature capacity fading; Incremental capacity analysis; Battery safety

Funding

  1. US-China Clean Energy Research Center-Clean Vehicle Consortium (CERC-CVC)
  2. MOST (Ministry of Science and Technology) of China [2014DFG71590]
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a study on the characterizations of large format lithium ion battery cells exposed to extreme high temperature but without thermal runaway. A unique test is set up: an extended volume-accelerating rate calorimetry (EV-ARC) test is terminated at a specific temperature before thermal runaway happens in the battery. The battery was cooled down after an EV-ARC test with early termination. The performances of the battery before and after the EV-ARC test are investigated in detail. The results show that (a) the melting point of the separator dictates the reusability of the 25 Ah NCM battery after a near-runaway event. The battery cannot be reused after being heated to 140 degrees C or higher because of the exponential rise in ohmic resistance; (b) a battery can lose up to 20% of its capacity after being heated to 120 degrees C just one time; (c) if a battery is cycled after a thermal event, its lost capacity may be recovered partially. Furthermore, the fading and recovery mechanisms are analyzed by incremental capacity analysis (ICA) and a prognostic/mechanistic model. Model analysis confirms that the capacity loss at extremely high temperature is caused by the increase of the resistance, the loss of lithium ion (LLI) at the anode and the loss of active material (LAM) at the cathode. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available