4.8 Article

Cathode refunctionalization as a lithium ion battery recycling alternative

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages 274-280

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.078

Keywords

Lithium ion batteries; Recycling; Sustainability; Waste management; End of life

Funding

  1. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) [PON 18503]
  2. National Science Foundation Environmental Health and Safety of Nanomaterials directorate [1133425]
  3. New York State Pollution Prevention Institute at RIT
  4. New York Battery and Energy Technology Consortium (NY-BEST) organization
  5. U.S. Government
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1133425] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An approach to battery end-of-life (EOL) management is developed involving cathode refunctionalization, which enables remanufacturing of the cathode from EOL materials to regain the electrochemical performance. To date, the optimal end-of-life management of cathode materials is based on economic value and environmental impact which can influence the methods and stage of recycling. Traditional recycling methods can recover high value metal elements (e.g. Li, Co, Ni), but still require synthesis of new cathode from a mix of virgin and recovered materials. Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) has been selected for study as a representative cathode material due to recent mass adoption and limited economic recycling drivers due to the low inherent cost of iron. Refunctionalization of EOL LiFePO4 cathode was demonstrated through electrochemical and chemical lithiation methods where the re-lithiated LiFePO4 regained the original capacity of 150-155 mAh g(-1). The environmental impact of the new recycling technique was determined by comparing the embodied energy of cathode material originating from virgin, recycled, and refunctionalized materials. The results demonstrate that the LiFePO4 refunctionalization process, through chemical lithiation, decreases the embodied energy by 50% compared to cathode production from virgin materials. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available