4.8 Article

Surface-layer formation by reductive decomposition of LiPF6 at relatively high potentials on negative electrodes in lithium ion batteries and its suppression

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 271, Issue -, Pages 431-436

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.010

Keywords

Lithium ion batteries; Negative electrode; Reductive decomposition; Electrolyte; LiPF6

Funding

  1. X-ray Free Electron Laser Priority Strategy Program (MEXT) of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  2. JSPS [25-2242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In using a LiPF6/ethylene carbonate-dimethyl carbonate electrolyte for lithium ion batteries (LIBs), a certain reductive reaction is known to occur at a relatively high potential (ca. 2.6 V vs. Li+/Li) on Sn electrode, but its details are still unknown. By means of in-situ X-ray reflectometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy observations and electrochemical measurements (by using mainly Sn electrode, and additionally Pt, graphite electrodes), we have found out that this reduction eventually forms an inactive passivation-layer consisting mainly of insulative LiF ascribed to the reductive decomposition of LiPF6, which significantly affects the battery cyclability. In contrast, a solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) is formed by the reductive reaction of the solvent at ca. 1.5 V vs. Li+/Li, which is lower than the reduction potential of LiPF6. However, we have found that the formation of SEI preempts that of the passivation layer when holding the electrode at a potential lower than 1.5 V vs. Li+/Li. Consequently, the cyclability is improved by suppressing the formation of the inactive passivation layer. Such a pretreatment would be quite effective on improvement of the battery cyclability, especially for a relatively noble electrode whose oxidation potential is between 1.5 V and 2.6 V vs. Li+/Li. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available