4.8 Article

Thermal management of cylindrical batteries investigated using wind tunnel testing and computational fluid dynamics simulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 238, Issue -, Pages 395-402

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.073

Keywords

Battery thermal management; CFD modeling; Wind tunnel testing; Reduced-order model

Funding

  1. Automotive Research Center (ARC), a U.S. Army Center of Excellence in Modeling and Simulation of Ground Vehicles

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work studied the thermal management of lithium ion batteries both numerically and experimentally. Numerically, a two dimensional CFD (computational fluid dynamics) model has been developed to perform detailed simulations of the thermal management issues within a battery pack cooled by air. Experimentally, systematic tests were performed to provide datasets to validate the CFD model. The main components in the experimental facility included a multi-cell battery pack and a wind tunnel. The wind tunnel facility generated well-controlled cooling air flow with velocity up to 30 m s(-1) (similar to 67 miles per hour). So that the study can be performed under flow conditions directly relevant to practice. The major contributions from this combined numerical-experimental study are threefold. First, the CFD model has been shown to capture the dynamics of the cooling of battery modules consisting of multiple battery cells, including temperature non-uniformity among cells. Second, the CFD simulations have been compared directly against experimental data to quantify the accuracy and validity of the CFD models. Third, based on the validated CFD models, a reduced-order model is developed to predict the maximum cell temperature in the battery module. The accuracy and simplicity of the reduced-order model makes it promising for in situ monitoring and control purposes. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available