4.8 Article

Electrophoretic fabrication and pseudocapacitive properties of graphene/manganese oxide/carbon nanotube nanocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages 594-602

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.055

Keywords

Pseudocapacitor; Electrophoretic deposition (EPD); Nanocomposites; Manganese oxide; Graphene; Energy storage

Funding

  1. National Science Council of ROC [NSC 99-2221-E-009-064-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hybrid nanocomposites provided a synergistic improvement on electrochemical performance and stability for pseudocapacitor. Designed graphene/carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/MnO2 nanocomposites with CNTs electrode (in short, GMC + C) with highly nanoporous framework surface structure are fabricated by a modified electrophoretic deposition (EPD) method. Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy analysis demonstrate that the flake-like MnO2 thickness (about less than 10 nm) and uniformly distributed on the porous graphene/CNTs framework. X-ray diffraction shows the formation of birnessite-type MnO2. Pseudocapacitances of the GMC + C electrode calculated by cyclic voltammetry having different scan rates of 5, 20, 50, 100, and 300 mV s(-1) exhibit high specific capacitances of 481, 436, 413, 398, and 372 F g, respectively. Sodium ion diffusion coefficients of the GMC + C electrode show a higher intercalation value of 3.647 x 10(-8) cm(2) s(-1) and deintercalation value of 2.899 x 10(-8) cm(2) s(-1) using chronoamperometry. Moreover, the GMC + C electrode maintains a high specific capacitance of 346 F g(-1), and is about 833% of the initial capacitance after 15,000 charge/discharge cycles. The designed hybrid GMC + C nanocomposites pseudocapacitor electrode using EPD route with the high specific capacitance, fast reaction rate, and high stability, exhibits high potential for practical applications. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available