4.8 Article

AlSb thin films as negative electrodes for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages 699-705

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.074

Keywords

AlSb sputtered thin films; Negative electrode (anode); Lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery; Sodium-ion (Na-ion) battery; Structure evolution (XRD)

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  2. Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
  3. Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  4. ORNL's Shared Research Equipment (ShaRE) User Program
  5. DOE-BES
  6. Ohio Research Scholars Program Research Cluster on Surfaces in Advanced Materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrochemical reactions of amorphous/nanocrystalline AlSb thin films prepared by magnetron sputtering are reported for the first time. The reaction with Li proceeds with an average reaction potential of 0.65 V, a reversible capacity of 750 mAh g(-1), and very fast reaction kinetics. A storage capacity close to 500 mAh g(-1) (70% of the maximum capacity) is achieved at 125 degrees C-rate. Only small increases in overpotentials are measured with increasing currents: 0.15 Vat 12 degrees C and 0.7 Vat 125 degrees C. In contrast, the reaction with Na results in average reaction potential of 0.5 V and a storage capacity of 450 mAh g(-1). The capacity retention and reaction kinetics with Na are presently not satisfactory with pronounced capacity losses upon cycling and larger overpotentials with increasing current. The capacity retention can be improved by using FEC additive in the Na-ion electrolyte, which highlights that the SEI plays an important role for the electrode cycling stability. The study of the reaction mechanism by X-ray diffraction reveals that the electrode material remains amorphous at all potentials, and suggests that during the reaction with Li the atomic short range ordering is similar to the expected phases. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available