4.8 Article

Suppressed lithium dendrite growth in lithium batteries using ionic liquid electrolytes: Investigation by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and in situ 7Li nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 237-243

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.124

Keywords

Lithium titanate; Lithium metal; Dendrite formation; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Scanning electron microscopy

Funding

  1. German Ministry for Education and Research
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the formation of lithium dendrites in lithium/Li4Ti5O12 battery cells is studied using different experimental techniques. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is presented as a tool to investigate non-invasively the dendritic growth on a lithium metal surface in lithium/Li4Ti5O12 cells during numerous discharging/charging cycles. Scanning electron microscopy is used for visual inspection of the dendrite formation. In situ Li-7 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is sensitive to quantitative changes at the lithium metal surface. Application to symmetrical lithium/lithium battery cells allows for a careful comparison of the investigated electrolytes. All these experimental methods provide consistent results. It is demonstrated that the growth of lithium dendrites is significantly correlated to the electrolyte employed. All electrolytes based on the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)azanide (EMIM-TFSA) show reduced dendrite growth in comparison to the standard electrolyte for Li-ion batteries, lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6) in ethylene carbonate/ dimethyl carbonate (EC/DMC). LiPF6 in EMIM-TFSA and LiPF6 in EMIM-TFSA/propylene carbonate suppress lithium dendrites most efficiently. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available