4.8 Article

Quantitative analysis of the performance impact of low-level carbon monoxide exposure in proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 228, Issue -, Pages 159-169

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.062

Keywords

PEMFC; Carbon monoxide; Overpotential; Oxygen crossover; Gas analysis; CO conversion

Funding

  1. United States Department of Energy/National Renewable Energy Laboratory [ZFH-7-77611-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance effect of the hydrogen fuel contaminant carbon monoxide (CO) for dry gas concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 ppm in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) is reported. Performance loss is investigated for different operating conditions including several temperatures, anode relative humidities, and current densities. An analytical method is presented to quantify performance loss due to CO exposure (Delta eta), the time required to attain steady state of the CO reaction mechanism (t(trans)), and the effectiveness of cell performance recovery in neat hydrogen. For select experiments, the magnitude of conversion of CO to carbon dioxide (CO2) at steady state (xi(CO)) is quantified with gas chromatography. The results show (i) Delta eta is greatest at high CO concentrations, high current density, and low anode relative humidity, (ii) oxygen crossover from the cathode decreases Delta eta, and (iii) xi(CO) is higher at a temperature of 60 degrees C than 80 degrees C. The latter may be attributed to an increased amount of liquid water in the cell increasing the oxygen crossover. The data also shows that recovery in neat hydrogen was typically complete. A summary of all experimental results of Delta eta is given in Appendix B as fitting equations and parameters to assist in cell performance model development. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available