4.8 Article

Capacity fading mechanism of LiFePO4-based lithium secondary batteries for stationary energy storage

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 229, Issue -, Pages 190-197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.024

Keywords

Lithium ion battery; Lithium iron phosphate; Graphite; Long-term cycling; Capacity fading

Funding

  1. Energy Efficiency & Resources of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning [20102010100090]
  2. Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20102010100090] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on the capacity fading mechanism of Li-ion batteries consisting of a graphite negative electrode and an olivine LiFePO4 positive electrode during long-term cycling. Laminated pouch type 1.5 Ah full cells are cycled 1000-3000 times at a rate of 4C and the full cells exhibit capacity losses of 10-15%. Half-cell study after full cell disassembly, using degraded electrodes, shows that considerable capacity loss occurs for the negative electrode even at low rates, but the total rate performance of the negative electrode is relatively better than that of the positive electrode. The initial capacity of the positive electrode is largely recovered under low rate conditions (0.1-0.5C), whereas a decline in the reversibility is observed at higher rates (1-5C). Loss of the active lithium source from the system is proposed as a primary source of capacity fading for the full cells. This loss is attributed to a change of the solid electrolyte interface during cycling as well as physical deterioration of the negative electrode due to the intrinsic volume change of the graphite electrode. On the other hand, the increased electrode resistance in the positive electrode is suggested to be the root cause of power fading. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available