4.8 Article

Preparation and characterization of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(vinylidene fluoride) blend membrane for vanadium redox flow battery application

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 237, Issue -, Pages 132-140

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.03.016

Keywords

Vanadium redox flow battery; Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone); Poly(vinylidene fluoride); Blend membrane; Ion selectivity

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB220105, 2013CB934000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20973099, 21273129]
  3. Shenzhen Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [JC201104210149A]
  4. Basic Research Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20120830152316442, JC201005310703A, CXZZ20120614194136123, JC201005310712A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blend membranes of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVdF) are prepared with various mixing mass ratios for vanadium redox flow battery application for the first time. The SPEEK/PVdF blend membranes are characterized by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The water uptake, swelling ratio, ion exchange capacity, proton conductivity, VO2+ permeability, ion selectivity, single cell performance and mechanical property of blend membranes are detailed evaluated. The blend membranes are dense and uniform when PVdF mass ratio ranges from 5 wt.% to 20 wt.%. The blend membrane with 15 wt.% PVdF (denoted as S/P 15) is further investigated for its good balance of proton conductivity and ion selectivity. The cell with S/P 15 membrane shows higher coulombic efficiency and energy efficiency compared with Nafion 117 membrane (98.0% vs. 92.0% and 81.0% vs. 75.8%, respectively). Furthermore, no obvious efficiency declines are observed after 80 cycles cell test accompanied with a lower discharge capacity decay rate. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available