4.8 Article

Synthesize battery degradation modes via a diagnostic and prognostic model

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 219, Issue -, Pages 204-216

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016

Keywords

Battery degradation modes; Incremental capacity (IC or dQ/dV); Differential voltage (DV or dV/dQ); Diagnostics and prognostics; Path dependence; Thermal and duty cycle aging

Funding

  1. Idaho National Laboratory under the Advanced Battery Research Program from the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the United States Department of Energy [DE-AC07-05ID14517]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Batteries are being used in increasingly complicated configurations with very demanding duty schedules. Such usage makes the use of batteries in multi-cell configurations to meet voltage, power, and energy demands in a very stressful manner. Thus, effective management and control of a battery system to allow efficient, reliable, and safe operation becomes vital, and diagnostic and prognostic tools are essential. Yet, developing these tools in practical applications is new to the industry, difficult and challenging. Here we present a novel mechanistic model that can enable battery diagnosis and prognosis. The model can simulate various what-if scenarios of battery degradation modes via a synthetic approach based on specific electrode behavior with proper adjustment of the loading ratio and the extent of degradation in and between the two electrodes. This approach is very different from the conventional empirical ones that correlate the cell parameters (such as impedance increases) with degradation in capacity or power fade to predict performance and life. This approach, with mechanistic understanding of battery degradation processes and failure mechanisms, offers unique high-fidelity simulation to address path dependence of the battery degradation. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available