4.8 Article

Investigation on the charging process of Li2O2-based air electrodes in Li-O2 batteries with organic carbonate electrolytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 196, Issue 8, Pages 3894-3899

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.065

Keywords

Li-O-2 battery; Li2O2 electrode; Gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy technique; Charging process; Gas evolution; Carbonate electrolyte

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The charging process of Li2O2-based air electrodes in Li-O-2 batteries with organic carbonate electrolytes was investigated using in situ gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS) to analyze gas evolution. A mixture of Li2O2/Fe3O4/Super P carbon/polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) was used as the starting air electrode material, and 1-M lithium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in carbonate-based solvents was used as the electrolyte. We found that Li2O2 was actively reactive to 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone and PVDF that were used to prepare the electrode. During the first charging (up to 4.6V), O-2 was the main component in the gases released. The amount of O-2 measured by GC/MS was consistent with the amount of Li2O2 that decomposed during the electrochemical process as measured by the charge capacity, which is indicative of the good chargeability of Li2O2. However, after the cell was discharged to 2.0V in an O-2 atmosphere and then recharged to similar to 4.6V, CO2 was dominant in the released gases. Further analysis of the discharged air electrodes by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy indicated that lithium-containing carbonate species (lithium alkyl carbonates and/or Li2CO3) were the main discharge products. Therefore, compatible electrolytes and electrodes, as well as the electrode-preparation procedures, need to be developed for rechargeable Li-air batteries for long term operation. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available