4.8 Article

Effect of the preparation method on the performance of CuO-MnOx-CeO2 catalysts for selective oxidation of CO in H2-rich streams

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 196, Issue 22, Pages 9590-9598

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.052

Keywords

Hydrogen purification; CO selective oxidation; Copper; Manganese; Ceria support

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011AA03A406]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2009R50020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selective oxidation of CO in H-2-rich streams is performed over a series of CuO-MnOx-CeO2 catalysts prepared by hydrothermal (CuMC-HY), co-precipitation (CuMC-CP), impregnation (CuMC-IM) and citrate sol-gel (CuMC-SG) methods. The catalysts are characterized by N-2 adsorption/desorption, XRD, SEM, HR-TEM, TPR and XPS techniques. The results show that the catalyst prepared by a hydrothermal method exhibits the best catalytic activity, especially at low temperatures. The temperature of 50% CO conversion (T-50) is only 74 degrees C and the temperature window of CO conversions up to 99.0% is about 40 degrees C wide, from 110 to 140 degrees C. Moreover, the temperature window is still maintained 20 degrees C wide even at lower temperatures when there are 15% CO2 and 7.5% H2O in the reaction gas. The superior catalytic performance of CuMC-HY is attributed to the formation of Mn-Cu-Ce-O solid solution, the unique pore structure and the existence of more Cu+ and Mn4+ species as well as oxygen vacancies. The sequence of catalytic activity is as follows: CuMC-HY > CuMC-SG > CuMC-IM > CuMC-CP. The worst catalytic activity, obtained from the catalyst prepared by the co-precipitation method, is possibly related to the existence of independent CuOx and MnOx oxides, which weakly interact with ceria in the catalyst. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available