4.8 Review

Internal steam reforming in solid oxide fuel cells: Status and opportunities of kinetic studies and their impact on modelling

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 196, Issue 1, Pages 25-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.06.091

Keywords

Internal steam reforming; Kinetics; Solid oxide fuel cells; Modeling; Ni-YSZ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) systems with internal steam reforming have the potential to become an economically competitive technology for cogeneration power plants, exploiting its significantly higher electrical efficiency compared to existing technologies. Optimal design and operation of such a system require SOFC matte's that include accurate description of the steam reforming rate. The objective of this article is to review the reported kinetic expressions for the steam reforming reaction. Extensive work has been performed on traditional catalysts for steam reforming. Because of differences in operating conditions, catalyst support material and structure it is critical to transfer this knowledge directly to internal reforming in SOFCs, which is discussed in further detail in this article. There are big differences in the reported kinetic expression for steam reforming over both industrial Ni catalysts and SOFC anode materials. Surprisingly, there is a good agreement between measured rates pr. geometric anode area at high operating temperatures, even for very different anodes. Detailed experimental data on the intrinsic steam reforming kinetics of Ni-YSZ are necessary for micro structure SOFC modeling, such expression are however lacking, but it may be viable to use measurements on industrial steam reforming catalysts instead. Nevertheless there is a further need for experimental studies on determining the exact steam reforming kinetics for SOFC anodes. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available