4.8 Article

Effect of co-doping nano-silica filler and N-methyl-N-propylpiperidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide into polymer electrolyte on Li dendrite formation in Li/poly(ethylene oxide)-Li(CF3SO2)2N/Li

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 196, Issue 18, Pages 7681-7686

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.04.001

Keywords

Dendrite; Ionic liquid; Ceramic filler; Lithium metal; Lithium air battery

Funding

  1. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22350091] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium metal dendrite growth in Li/poly (ethylene oxide)-lithium bis (trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide (PEO18LiTFSI), nano-silica, and N-methyl-N-propylpiperidinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (PP13TFSI) composite solid polymer electrolyte/Li was investigated by direct in situ observation. The dendrite onset time decreased with increasing current density and deviated from Sand's law in the current density range of 0.1-0.5 mA cm(-2) at 60 degrees C. Lithium dendrite formation was not observed until 46 h of polarization at 0.5 mA cm(-2) and 60 degrees C, which is a significant improvement compared to that observed in Li/(PEO18LiTFSI)/Li, where the dendrite formation was observed after 15 h polarization at 0.5 mA cm(-2) and 60 degrees C. The suppression of dendrite formation could be explained by the electrical conductivity enhancement and decrease of the interface resistance between Li and the polymer electrolyte by the introduction of both nano-SiO2 and PP13TFSI into PEO18LiTFSI. The electrical conductivity of 4.96 x 10(-4) S cm(-1) at 60 degrees C was enhanced to 7.6 x 10(-4) S cm(-1), and the interface resistance of Li/PEO18LiTFSI/Li of 248 Omega cm(2) was decreased to 74 Omega cm(2) by the addition of both nano-SiO2 and PP13TFSI into PEO18LiTFSI. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available