4.8 Article

Electrodeposition and pseudocapacitive properties of tungsten oxide/polyaniline composite

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 196, Issue 10, Pages 4842-4848

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.073

Keywords

Tungsten oxide; Polyaniline; Negative electrode material; Asymmetric capacitor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50973013]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [SKLSSM 201002]
  3. Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry (Heilongjiang University), Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Composite films of tungsten oxide (WO3) and polyaniline (PANI) have been electrodeposited by cyclic voltammetry in a mixed solution of aniline and precursor of tungsten oxide. Surface morphology and chemical composition of WO3/PANI composite are characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The influence of H2O2 on the electrodeposition of WO3/PANI composite film is also investigated. Cyclic voltammetry (CV), chronopotentiometry (CP) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results show that WO3/PANI composite film exhibit good pseudocapacitive performance over a wide potential range of -0.5 to 0.7 V vs. SCE with the specific capacitance of 168 F g(-1) at current density of 1.28 mA cm(-2) and energy density of 33.6 Wh kg(-1), which is 91% higher than that of similarly prepared PANI (17.6 Wh kg(-1)). An asymmetric model capacitor using WO3/PANI as negative and PANI as positive electrodes over voltage range of 1.2 V displays a specific capacitance of 48.6 F g(-1) and energy density of 9.72 Wh kg(-1) at the power density of 53 W kg(-1),which is two times higher than that of a symmetric capacitor modeled by using two PANI films as both positive and negative electrodes. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available