4.8 Article

Electrochemical properties of composite cathodes for La0.995Ca0.005NbO4-δ-based proton conducting fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 196, Issue 22, Pages 9220-9227

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.041

Keywords

PC-SOFCs; Cathodes; Proton conductor; Cer-cer; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; LaNbO4; LSM

Funding

  1. European Union [227560]
  2. Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation [ENE2008-06302, 2008801093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrochemical properties of mixed-conducting ceramic-ceramic (cer-cer) composites for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells (PC-SOFCs) based on La0.995Ca0.005NbO4-delta (LCN) have been investigated. Different ratios of La0.8Sr0.2MnO3-delta/La0.995Ca0.005NbO4-delta (LSM/LCN) composites have been tested as cathodes in symmetrical cells based on La0.995Ca0.005NbO4-delta dense electrolytes while two different electrode sintering temperatures (1050 and 1150 degrees C) have been studied. Additionally, different LCN doped materials (Pr, Ce and Mn), which present a different conduction behavior, have been used as components in composite cathodes (mixtures of LSM/doped-LCN 50/50 vol.%). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis has been carried out in the temperature range 700-900 degrees C under moist (2.5%) atmospheres. Different oxygen partial pressures (pO(2)) have been employed in order to characterize the processes (surface reaction and charge transport) occurring at the composite electrode under oxidizing conditions. The main outcome of the present study is that the mixture of LSM (electronic phase) and LCN (protonic phase) enables to decrease substantially the electrode polarization resistance. This is ascribed to the increase in the three-phase-boundary length and therefore it allows electrochemical reactions to occur in a larger region (thickness) of the electrode. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available