4.8 Article

Treatment of carbon fiber brush anodes for improving power generation in air-cathode microbial fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 195, Issue 7, Pages 1841-1844

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.030

Keywords

Carbon fiber; Pretreatment; Microbial fuel cells; Power generation

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [50638020]
  2. National Creative Research Groups of China [50821002]
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-I1-003-13]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource Environment [2008TS04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon brush electrodes have been used to provide high surface areas for bacterial growth and high power densities in microbial fuel cells (MFCs). A high-temperature ammonia gas treatment has been used to enhance power generation, but less energy-intensive methods are needed for treating these electrodes in practice. Three different treatment methods are examined here for enhancing power generation of carbon fiber brushes: acid soaking (CF-A). heating (CF-H), and a combination of both processes (CF-AH). The combined heat and acid treatment improve power production to 1370 mW m(-2), which is 34% larger than the untreated control (CF-C, 1020 mWm(-2)). This power density is 25% higher than using only acid treatment (1100 mWm(-2)) and 7% higher than that using only heat treatment (1280 mW m(-2)). XPS analysis of the treated and untreated anode materials indicates that power increases are related to higher N1s/C1s ratios and a lower C-O composition. These findings demonstrate efficient and simple methods for improving power generation using graphite fiber brushes, and provide insight into reasons for improving performance that may help to further increase power through other graphite fiber modifications. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available