4.8 Article

Anodic deposition of manganese oxide electrodes with rod-like structures for application as electrochemical capacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 195, Issue 7, Pages 2110-2117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.045

Keywords

Electrodeposition; Electrochemical capacitor; Manganese oxide; Electron microscopy; Voltammetry

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrochemical properties of nanocrystalline manganese oxide electrodes with rod-like structures were investigated to determine the effect of morphology, chemistry and crystal structure on the corresponding electrochemical behavior of manganese electrodes. Manganese oxide electrodes of high porosity composed of 1-1.5 mu m diameter rods were electrochemically synthesized by anodic deposition from a dilute solution of Mn(CH3COO)(2) (manganese acetate) onto Au coated Si substrates without any surfactants, catalysts or templates under galvanostatic control. The morphology of the electrodes depended on the deposition current density, which greatly influenced the electrochemical performance of the capacitor. Electrochemical property and microstructure analyses of the manganese oxide electrodes were conducted using cyclic voltammetry and microstructural techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The synthesized rod-like manganese oxide electrodes at low current densities exhibited a high specific capacitance due to their large surface areas. The largest value obtained was 185 F g(-1) for deposits produced at .5 mA cm(-2). Specific capacity retention for all deposits, after 250 charge-discharge cycles in an aqueous solution of 0.5 M Na2SO4, was about 75% of the initial capacity. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available