4.8 Article

Effect of heat-treatment temperature on carbon corrosion in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 195, Issue 9, Pages 2623-2627

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.071

Keywords

Carbon nanofiber; Durability; Heat-treatment temperature; Carbon corrosion; Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell

Funding

  1. Ministry of Knowledge Economy of Korea [2009T100100606]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2009-0092926]
  3. Korean Government (MEST)
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20093021030021, 2005-N-CT-HM-E-01-0000] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0092930] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the effect of heat-treatment temperature on the electrochemical corrosion of carbon nanofibers (CNFs) in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Corrosion is investigated by monitoring the generation of CO2 using an on-line mass spectrometer at a constant potential of 1.4V for 30 min. The experimental results show that the generation of CO2 decreases with increasing heat-treatment temperature, indicating that less electrochemical carbon corrosion occurs. In particular, when the heat-treatment temperature is 2400 degrees C, the change intensifies. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis shows that oxygen functional groups on the carbon surface decrease with increasing heat-treatment temperature. A reduction in oxygen functional groups increases the hydrophobic nature of the carbon surface, which is responsible for the increased corrosion resistance of CNFs. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available