4.8 Article

Design of highly efficient coal-based integrated gasification fuel cell power plants

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 195, Issue 17, Pages 5707-5718

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.045

Keywords

SOFC; IGFC; Catalytic hydro-gasification; CO(2) capture

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. National Energy Technology Laboratory, University of California, Irvine [RDS41817.3130105-036]
  3. an agency of the United States Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integrated gasification fuel cell (IGFC) technology combining coal gasification and solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is believed to be the only viable solution to achieving U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)'s performance goal for next generation coal-based power plants, producing electricity at 60% efficiency (coal HHV-AC) while capturing more than 90% of the evolved CO(2). Achieving this goal is challenging even with high performance SOFCs: design concepts published to date have not demonstrated this performance goal. In this work an IGFC system concept consisting of catalytic hydro-gasification, proven low-temperature gas cleaning and hybrid fuel cell-gas turbine power block (with SOFC operating at about 10 bar) is introduced. The system is demonstrating an electricity efficiency greater than 60% (coal HHV basis), with more than 90% of the carbon present in the syngas separated as CO(2) amenable to sequestration. A unique characteristic of the system is recycling de-carbonized, humidified anode exhaust back to the catalytic hydro-gasifier for improved energy integration. Alternative designs where: (1) anode exhaust is recycled directly back to SOFC stacks, (2) SOFC stack operating pressure is reduced to near atmospheric and (3) methanation reactor in the reactor/expander topping cycle is removed, have also been investigated and the system design and performance differences are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available