4.8 Article

Development of a tubular microbial fuel cell (MFC) employing a membrane electrode assembly cathode

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 187, Issue 2, Pages 393-399

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.020

Keywords

Microbial fuel cell; Membrane electrode assembly; Tubular; Impedance Spectroscopy; Ion exchange membrane; Electro-osmotic drag

Funding

  1. UK EPSRC SUPERGEN Biological Fuel Cell [EP/D047943/1, 68-3A75-3-150]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D047943/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/D047943/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tubular microbial fuel cells (MFC) with air cathode might be amenable to scale-up but with increasing volume a mechanically robust, cost-effective cathode structure is required. Membrane electrode assemblies (MEA) are investigated in a tubular MFC using cost-effective cation (CEM) or anion (AEM) exchange membrane. The MEA fabrication mechanically combines a cathode electrode with the membrane between a perforated cylindrical polypropylene shell and tube. Hydrogel application between membrane and cathode increases cathode potential by similar to 100mV over a 0-5.5 mA range in a CEM-MEA. Consequently, 6.1 W m(-3) based on reactor liquid volume (200 cm(3)) are generated compared with 5 W m(-3) without hydrogel. Cathode potential is also improved in AEM-MEA using hydrogel. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) to compare MEA's performance suggests reduced impedance and enhanced membrane-cathode contact area when using hydrogel. The maximum coulombic efficiency observed with CEM-MEA is 71% and 63% with AEM-MEA. Water loss through the membrane varies with external load resistance, indicating that total charge transfer in the MFC is related to electro-osmotic drag of water through the membrane. The MEA developed here has been shown to be mechanically robust, operating for more than six month at this scale without problem. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available