4.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Synthesis and characterization of LiNi0.6Mn0.4-xCoxO2 as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 189, Issue 1, Pages 28-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.046

Keywords

Cathode materials; Layered composite oxide; LiNi0.6Mn0.4-xCoxO2; Li-ion battery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LiNi0.6CoxMn0.4-xO2 (x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.2) cathode materials are prepared, and their structural and electrochemical properties are investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) and charge-discharge test. The results show that well-ordering layered LiNi0.6CoxMn0.4-xO2 (x = 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.2) cathode materials are successfully prepared in air at 850 degrees C. The increase of the Co content in LiNi0.6Mn0.4-xCoxO2 leads to the acceleration of the grain growth, the increase of the initial discharge capacity and the deterioration of the cycling performance of LiNi0.6Mn0.4-xCoxO2. It also leads to the enhancement of the ratio Ni3+/Ni2+ in LiNi0.6CoxMn0.4-xO2, which is approved by the XPS analysis, resulting in the increase of the phase transition during cycling. This is speculated to be main reason for the deteriotion of the cycling performance. All synthesized LiNi0.6CoxMn0.4-xO2 samples charged at 4.3 V show exothermic peaks with an onset temperature of larger than 255 degrees C, and give out less than 400 J g(-1) of total heat flow associated with the peaks in DSC analysis profile, exhibiting better thermal stability. LiNi0.6CoxMn0.4-xO2 with low Co content and good thermal stability presents a capacity of 156.6 mAh g(-1) and 98.5% of initial capacity retention after 50 cycles, showing to be a promising cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available