4.8 Article

Enhanced methane storage of chemically and physically activated carbide-derived carbon

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 191, Issue 2, Pages 560-567

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.019

Keywords

Methane storage; Carbide-derived carbon; Small-angle X-ray scattering; Pore size; Activation

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FC36-04GO14282]
  2. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2007-357-D00061]
  3. National Research Council Research Associate Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbide-derived carbons (CDCs) produced by chlorination of carbides offer great potential for precise pore size control at the atomic level, making them attractive candidates for energy storage media. CDCs activated with CO2. or KOH possess distinct improvements in porosity, displaying specific surface areas above 3000 m(2) g(-1) and pore volumes above 1.3 cm(3) g(-1). These correspond to gravimetric methane uptake of 16 wt% at 35 bar and 25 C, close to the Currently best reported material PCN-14, a metal-organic frame-work (MOF), at 35 bar and 17 C or KOH activated anthracite at 35 bar and 25 C. The best excess gravimetric methane uptake is obtained with a TiC-derived CDC activated with CO2 at 975 C for 2 h, namely a very large surface area of 3360 m(2) g(-1) resulting in 18.5 wt% at 25 C and 60 bar. To obtain realistic volumetric methane capacity, the packing density of completely dried CDC was measured, from which we obtain excess capacity of 145 v(STP) v(-1) from CDC activated With CO2 at 875 C for 8 h, 81% of the DOE target (180 v(STP) v(-1)) at 35 bar and 25 C. From small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements, pore radii of gyration (R-g) between 0.5 nm and 1 nm are determined. Temperature-dependent methane isotherms show that the isosteric heat of adsorption reaches 24 kJ mol(-1) at the initial stage of low loading. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available