4.8 Article

Effect of the support properties on the preparation and performance of platinum catalysts supported on carbon nanofibers

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 192, Issue 1, Pages 144-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.005

Keywords

Carbon nanofibers; Morphology; Surface chemistry; Electrocatalyst; PEMFC

Funding

  1. Aragon Government [PM042/2007]
  2. Spanish National Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Platinum nanoparticles were supported on carbon nanofibers (CNFs) for their use as electrocatalyst for PEM fuel cells. Before platinum deposition, CNFs were oxidized using concentrated HNO3 or a HNO3-H2SO4 mixture as oxidizing agents. During these treatments, new surface oxygen groups were created. Moreover, the most severe treatments resulted in the shortening of CNFs. Both effects allow to study the influence of both the morphology and the surface chemistry of CNFs on the preparation and performance of Pt electrocatalysts. Catalysts were prepared by the incipient wetness impregnation method. CNFs and electrocatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and N-2-physisorption. Furthermore, the performance of Pt/CNF based electrodes was compared with that of a commercial Pt/carbon black electrode (E-TEK) in a 1-cm(2) PEM fuel cell. The results showed that both the surface chemistry and the morphology of the support have an important effect on the dispersion, particle size and activity of Pt catalysts. An increase in the agglomeration degree of Pt particles as the severity of oxidation treatments increased was observed. However, the performance of Pt/CNF electrodes was better than that of the commercial one. This was attributed to the CNF porous structure and to the better Pt-support interaction through the surface oxygen groups of the support. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available