4.8 Article

Physical and electrochemical properties of spherical Li1+x(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)1-xO2 cathode materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 177, Issue 1, Pages 177-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.062

Keywords

carbonate precipitation; Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O-2; lithium secondary batteries; positive materials; layered materials

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1908] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A (Ni1/3Co1/3 Mn-1/3)CO3 precursor with an uniform, spherical morphology was prepared by coprecipitation using a continuously stirred tank reactor method. The as-prepared spherical (Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)CO3 precursor served to produce dense, spherical Li1+x(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)(1-x)O-2 (0 <= x <= 0.15) cathode materials. These Li-rich cathodes were also prepared by a second synthesis route that involved the use of an M3O4 (M = Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3) spinel compound, itself obtained from the carbonate (Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)CO3 precursor. In both cases, the final Li1+x(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)(1-x)O-2 products were highly uniform, having a narrow particle size distribution (10-mu m average particle size) as a result of the homogeneity and spherical morphology of the starting mixed-metal carbonate precursor. The rate capability of the Li1+x(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)(1-x)O-2 electrode materials, which was significantly improved with increased lithium content, was found to be better in the case of the denser materials made from the spinel precursor compound. This result suggests that spherical morphology, high density, and increased lithium content were key factors in enabling the high rate capabilities, and hence the power performances, of the Li-rich Li1+x(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)(1-x)O-2 cathodes. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available