4.8 Article

Development of non-flammable lithium secondary battery with room-temperature ionic liquid electrolyte: Performance of electroplated Al film negative electrode

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 183, Issue 1, Pages 347-350

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.04.063

Keywords

lithium secondary battery; negative electrode; aluminum; ambient-temperature molten salt; room-temperature ionic liquid; GD-OES

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture [17073013]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17073013] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The negative electrode performance of the electroplated Al film electrode in the LiCl saturated AlCl3-1-ethyl-3-methylimizadolium chloride (EMIC)+SOCl2 melt as the electrolyte for use in non-flammable lithium secondary batteries was evaluated. In the cyclic voltammogram of the electroplated Al film electrode in the melt. the oxidation and reduction waves corresponding to the electrochemical insertion/extraction reactions of the Li+ ion were observed at 0-0.80V vs. Li+/Li, which suggested that the electroplated Al film electrode operated well in the electrolyte. The almost flat potential profiles at about 0.40 V vs. Li+/Li on discharging were shown. The discharge capacity and charge-discharge efficiency was 236 mAh g(-1) and 79.2% for the 1st cycle and it maintained 232 mAh g(-1) and 77.9% after the 10th cycle. In addition, the initial charge-discharge efficiencies of the electroplated Al film electrode were higher than that of carbon electrodes. The main cathodic polarization reaction was the insertion of Li+ ions, and side reactions hardly occurred due to the decomposition reaction of the melt because the Li content corresponding to the electricity was almost totally inserted into the film after charging. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available