4.5 Article

Oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane over bimetallic mesoporous and microporous zeolites with CO2 as mild oxidant

Journal

JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1257-1270

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-013-9710-6

Keywords

Oxidative dehydrogenation; n-Butane; Mesoporous; Microporous; Bimetals; Zeolites, carbon dioxide

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Saudi Arabia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative dehydrogenation of n-butane was tested using carbon dioxide as a mild oxidant over bimetallic Cr-V supported catalysts (MCM-41, ZSM-5, MCM-22 and mesoZSM-5). The textural properties of the catalysts were measured by means of XRD, N-2 adsorption, SEM-EDX, Raman, H-2-TPR, pyridine FT-IR, NH3 and CO2-TPD techniques. The metal content of Cr and V was maintained around 1.2 and 2.8 wt% for the catalytic test in packed bed reactor at different temperatures (525-600 A degrees C) for 180 min. 1.2Cr2.8 V/MCM-41 and 1.2Cr2.8 V/ZSM-5 exhibited maximum conversion of 14 and 13.1 %, respectively at 10 min and 600 A degrees C. Significantly, high butenes selectivity was observed over MCM-41 (86.27 %) than ZSM-5 support (58.1 %). The mesoporosity in ZSM-5 had a negative impact on conversion level (7.1 %) but improved the butenes selectivity slightly. 1.2Cr2.8 V/M-22 showed the highest cracking ability leading to overall reduced butenes selectivity (57.9 %). The study shows that over all catalysts, n-butane conversion is independent of CO2 conversion. 1.2Cr2.8 V/M-22 showed highest CO2 conversion in the range 2.35-2.2 % between 525 and 550 A degrees C. The apparent activation energies of dehydrogenation and cracking reaction over the four catalysts were evaluated. The ratio of conversion to coke weight per cent over the four catalysts are observed in the following order: 1.2Cr2.8 V/M-41 > 1.2Cr2.8 V/Z-5 > 1.2Cr2.8 V/mesoZ-5 > 1.2Cr2.8 V/M-22.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available