4.1 Article

Fabrication and Characterization of SiO2/PVDF Composite Nanofiber-Coated PP Nonwoven Separators for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART B-POLYMER PHYSICS
Volume 51, Issue 23, Pages 1719-1726

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/polb.23387

Keywords

battery separators; electrospinning; fibers; nanocomposites; nanoparticles; polyvinylidene fluoride; SiO2 nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Advanced Transportation Energy Center
  2. ERC Program of the National Science Foundation [EEC-08212121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

SiO2/polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) composite nanofiber-coated polypropylene (PP) nonwoven membranes were prepared by electrospinning of SiO2/PVDF dispersions onto both sides of PP nonwovens. The goal of this study was to combine the good mechanical strength of PP nonwoven with the excellent electrochemical properties of SiO2/PVDF composite nanofibers to obtain a new high-performance separator. It was found that the addition of SiO2 nanoparticles played an important role in improving the overall performance of these nanofiber-coated nonwoven membranes. Among the membranes with various SiO2 contents, 15% SiO2/PVDF composite nanofiber-coated PP nonwoven membranes provided the highest ionic conductivity of 2.6 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) after being immersed in a liquid electrolyte, 1 mol L-1 lithium hexafluorophosphate in ethylene carbonate, dimethyl carbonate and diethyl carbonate. Compared with pure PVDF nanofiber-coated PP nonwoven membranes, SiO2/PVDF composite fiber-coated PP nonwoven membranes had greater liquid electrolyte uptake, higher electrochemical oxidation limit, and lower interfacial resistance with lithium. SiO2/PVDF composite fiber-coated PP nonwoven membrane separators were assembled into lithium/lithium iron phosphate cells and demonstrated high cell capacities and good cycling performance at room temperature. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available