4.1 Article

Micromechanical Modeling of the Elastic Properties of Semicrystalline Polymers: A Three-Phase Approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART B-POLYMER PHYSICS
Volume 48, Issue 20, Pages 2173-2184

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/polb.22099

Keywords

composite inclusion; crystal structures; lamellar; mechanical properties; microdeformation; micromechanical modeling; microstructure; modeling; modulus; polyethylene (PE); rigid-amorphous phase; semicrystalline polymers; structure-property relations

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW
  2. Applied science division of NWO
  3. Ministry of Economic Affairs [07730]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical performance of semicrystalline polymers is strongly dependent on their underlying microstructure, consisting of crystallographic lamellae and amorphous layers. In line with that, semicrystalline polymers have previously been modeled as two and three-phase composites, consisting of a crystalline and an amorphous phase and, in case of the three-phase composite, a rigid-amorphous phase between the other two, having a somewhat ordered structure and a constant thickness. In this work, the ability of two-phase and three-phase composite models to predict the elastic modulus of semicrystalline polymers is investigated. The three-phase model incorporates an internal length scale through crystalline lamellar and interphase thicknesses, whereas no length scales are included in the two-phase model. Using linear elastic behavior for the constituent phases, a closed form solution for the average stiffness of the inclusion is obtained. A hybrid inclusion interaction model has been used to compute the effective elastic properties of polyethylene. The model results are compared with experimental data to assess the capabilities of the two- or three-phase composite inclusion model. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 48: 2173-2184, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available