4.2 Article

Design of High-χ Block Copolymers for Lithography

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.27370

Keywords

block copolymers; interaction parameter; lithography; reactive ion etching; self-assembly

Funding

  1. Nissan Chemical Company
  2. ASTC
  3. Rashid Engineering Regents Chair
  4. National Science Foundation Scalable Nanomanufacturing Program [1120823]
  5. IBM Ph.D. Fellowship Program
  6. Endowed Graduate Fellowship in Engineering
  7. Virginia Fellowship in Engineering
  8. Ernest Cockrell, Jr. Fellowship in Engineering
  9. Welch Foundation [F-1709]
  10. Directorate For Engineering
  11. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1120823] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report describes the design and synthesis of a series of lamella-forming, silicon-containing block copolymers (Si-BCPs) and evaluation of these materials as potential candidates for lithographic applications. The interaction parameter of each Si-BCP is measured by both the mean-field theory predicted order-disorder transition and by analysis of X-ray scattering profiles. The introduction of more-polar methoxy and less-polar methylsilyl moieties increases to about 2-3 times that of the reference material, poly(styrene-block-4-trimethylsilylstyrene). The incremental increases appear to be essentially additive in this family of block copolymers, suggesting that improvements in can be predicted from appropriate monomer choice. Perpendicularly oriented thin-films of the ordered Si-BCPs generated by thermally annealing between two neutral polymeric surfaces and developed by etching on commercial RIE equipment show excellent image fidelity. These images demonstrate the excellent etch contrast of the Si-BCPs and document improvements in pattern fidelity that are realized with more strongly segregated BCPs. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2015, 53, 344-352

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available