4.4 Article

The creation of large-volume, gradient-free warm dense matter with an x-ray free-electron laser

Journal

PHYSICS OF PLASMAS
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4916103

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  2. French Research Network RTRA Triangle de la Physique [MELEL 2010-053T]
  3. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [OEDYP - ANR-09- BLAN-0206-01, 11-IDEX-0004-02]
  4. CNRS via the Program PEPS SASLEX
  5. FCT Project [PTDC/FIS/112392/2009]
  6. LABEX Plas@Par Project
  7. EPSRC [EP/H035877/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H035877/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficiency and uniformity of heating induced by hard x-ray free-electron laser pulse is investigated for 0.5 mu m silver foils using the X-ray Pump Probe instrument at the Linac Coherent Light Source facility. Intense 8.9 keV x-ray pulses of 60 fs duration deposit energy predominantly via inner-shell ionization to create a non-equilibrium Ag solid density plasma. The x-ray pulses are focused to 14 X 17 mu m(2) by means of beryllium lenses and by varying the total beam energy, the energy deposition is varied over a range of irradiances from 4.4 to 6.5 X 10(15) W/cm(2). Two time-and-space resolved interferometers simultaneously probed the expansion of the front and rear sample surfaces and find evidence of a nearly symmetric expansion pointing to the uniformity of energy deposition over the full target thickness. The experimental results are compared with two different hydrodynamic simulations of the sample expansion. The agreement between experimental and theoretical results yields an estimate of the temperature evolution as a function of x-ray irradiance that varies from 8 to 10 eV for the x-ray irradiances studied. (C) 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available