4.2 Article

Synthesis of Novel Hyperbranched Polymer Through Cationic Ring-Opening Multibranching Polymerization of 2-Hydroxymethyloxetane

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART A-POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 49, Issue 11, Pages 2353-2365

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.24664

Keywords

cationic polymerization; hyperbranched; ring-opening polymerization; slow-monomer-addition

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23750261, 22350096, 09J03844] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cationic ring-opening multibranching polymerization of 2-hydroxymethyloxetane (1) as a novel latent AB(2)-type monomer was carried out using trifluoromethane sulfonic acid or trifluoroboron diethyl etherate by a slow-monomer-addition (SMA) method. The polymer yield of poly-1 ranged from ca. 58-88%, which increase with the increasing monomer addition time on the SMA method. The absolute molecular weights (M-w,M-MALLS) and the polydispersities of poly-1 were in the range of 8,000-43,500 and 1.45-4.53, respectively, which also increased with the increasing monomer addition time. The Mark-Houwink-Sakurada exponents alpha in 0.2 M NaNO3 aq. were determined to be 0.02-0.25 for poly-1, indicating that poly-1 has compact forms in the solution because of the highly branched structure. The degree of the branching value of poly-1, which was calculated by Frey's equation, ranged from ca. 0.50 to 0.58, which increased with the increasing monomer addition time. The steady shear flow of poly-1 in aqueous solution exhibited a Newtonian behavior with steady shear viscosities independent of the shear rate. The results of the MALLS, NMR, and viscosity measurements indicated that poly-1 is composed of a highly branched structure, i.e., the hyperbranched poly (2-hydroxymethyloxetane). (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 49: 2353-2365, 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available