4.2 Article

Synthesis of Chiral Amphiphilic Diblock Copolymers via Consecutive RAFT Polymerizations and Their Aggregation Behavior in Aqueous Solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART A-POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 23, Pages 7690-7701

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pola.23072

Keywords

amphiphilic copolymers; chiral; reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT); self-assembly

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [20874069]
  2. Science and Technology Development Planning of Jiangsu Province [BK2007702, BK2007048]
  3. Nature Science Key Basic Research of Jiangsu Province for Higher Education [05KJA15008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two chiral amphiphilic diblock copolymers with different relative lengths of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic blocks, poly(6-O-p-vinylbenzyl-1,2:3,4-Di-O-isopropylidene-D-galactopyranose)-b-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) or poly(VBCPG)-b-poly(NIPAAM) and poly(20-(hydroxymethyl)-pregna-1,4-dien-3-one methacrylate)-b-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) or poly(NMC-HPD)-b-poly(NIPAAM) were synthesized via consecutive reversible addition-fragmentation chain-transfer polymerizations of VBCPG or MAC-HPD and NIPAAM. The chemical structures of these diblock copolymers were characterized by H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. These amphiphilic diblock copolymers could self-assemble into micelles in aqueous solution, and the morphologies of micelles were investigated by transmission electron microscopy. By comparison with the lower critical solution temperatures (LCST) of poly (NIPAAM) homopolymer in deionized water (32 degrees C), a higher LCST of the chiral amphiphilic diblock copolymer (poly(VBCPG)-b-poly(NIPAAM)) was observed and the LCST increased with the relative length of the poly(VBCPG) block in the copolymer from 35 to 47 degrees C, respectively. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 7690-7701, 2008

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available