4.0 Article

Registration of 'Eve' Winter Hulless Barley

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT REGISTRATIONS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 5-11

Publisher

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.3198/jpr2012.03.0148crc

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station
  2. Virginia Small Grains Board
  3. Maryland Grain Producers Utilization Board
  4. Kentucky Small Grains Grower Association
  5. U.S. Wheat and Barley Scab Initiative
  6. U.S. Department of Agriculture [59-0790-4-102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

'Eve' (Reg. No. CV-350, PI 659067), a six-row, winter hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) developed and tested as VA01H-68 by the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, was released in May 2007. Eve was derived from the cross SC860974/VA94-42-13 using a modified bulk-breeding method. It was evaluated in the 2009-2011 Virginia Official Variety Trial in replicated tests at five to six locations. Eve had an average grain yield (3718 kg ha(-1)) that was higher than those of the hulless check cultivars Dan and Doyce. The average grain volume weight of Eve (73.8 kg hL(-1)) over the same period was higher than that of Doyce (68.9 kg hL(-1)). The head emergence of Eve is 6 d earlier than Dan and 'Thoroughbred', which is the predominant barley cultivar grown in the eastern United States. Earlier maturity is a primary factor determining whether barley or wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is used in double-cropping systems with soybean (Glycine max L.). The grain of Eve has high starch (60.4%) and protein (10.1%) concentration. Eve is the first winter hulless barley released in the eastern United States having a high level of resistance to Fusarium head blight [FHB; caused by Fusarium graminearum (Schwabe)] and reduced accumulation of the mycotoxin deoxnivalenol in the grain. Eve's unique grain composition and resistance to FHB make it desirable as a commodity for food, feed, and ethanol production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available