4.7 Article

Different responses of tonoplast proton pumps in cucumber roots to cadmium and copper

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 16, Pages 1328-1335

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.03.020

Keywords

Heavy metals; Proton pump; Tonoplast; V-ATPase; V PPase

Categories

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N303 112 32/3841]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cadmium (Cd) and copper (Cu) effects on the two tonoplast proton pumps were compared in cucumber roots Different alterations of vacuolar H+ transporting ATPase (V-ATPase) (EC 3 63 14) and vacuolar H+ transporting pyrophosphatase (V-PPase) (EC 3 6 1 1) activities under heavy metal stress were investigated ATP-dependent proton transport and ATP hydrolysis increased after exposure of seedlings to Cu whereas both decreased in plants stressed with Cd PP1 hydrolysis was relatively insensitive to both heavy metals However cadmium but not copper clearly inhibited PP1-driven H+ transport Changes in enzyme activities were not due to the metal action on the expression of CsVHA A CsVHA-c and CsVP genes encoding V-ATPase subunit A and c and V-PPase respectively in cucumber roots Moreover immunoblot analysis using specific antibodies against V-ATPase holoenzyme phosphoserine and phosphothreonine suggested that the phosphorylation at Set residue in regulatory subunit B of cucumber V-ATPase was not regulated by metals Oxidative alterations of membrane lipids were measured as malondialdehyde (MDA) content Cu ions in contrast to Cd visibly enhanced the lipid peroxidation in the root tonoplast fractions Because ATP and PP1 are absolutely required by V-ATPase and V-PPase respectively for proton transport their contents were determined in the control roots and roots treated with cadmium and copper Both ATP and pyrophosphate amounts decreased under heavy metal stress (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available