4.5 Article

Effect of nitrogen fertilization on nitrogen dynamics in oilseed rape using 15N-labeling field experiment

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE
Volume 173, Issue 6, Pages 875-884

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200800270

Keywords

Brassica napus L.; nitrogen; uptake; remobilization; stable isotope

Funding

  1. PROMOSOL
  2. Conseil Regional de Basse-Normandie
  3. Centre Technique Interprofessionnel des Oleagineux Metropolitains (CETIOM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to optimize nitrogen (N) fertilization and to reduce the environmental impact of oilseed rape without decreasing yield, a clearer understanding of N dynamics inside the plant is crucial. The present investigation therefore aimed to study the effects of different N-application rates on the dynamics of N uptake, partitioning, and remobilization. The experiment was conducted on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Capitol) under three levels of N input (0, 100, and 200 kg N ha(-1)) from stem elongation to maturity using N-15-labeling technique to distinguish between N uptake and N retranslocation in the plant. Nitrogen fertilization affected the time-course of N uptake and also the allocation of N taken up from flowering to maturity. Most pod N came from N remobilization, and leaves accounted for the largest source of remobilized N regardless the N-application rate. However, the contribution of leaves to the remobilized N pool increased with the N dose whereas the one of taproot decreased. Stems were the main sink for remobilized N from stem elongation to flowering. Leaves remained longer on N200 than on N0 and N100 plants, and N concentration in fallen leaves increased with the N treatment and in N100 plants along an axial gradient from the basal to the upper leaves. Overall, these results show that the timing of N supply is more crucial than the N amount to attain a high N efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available