4.4 Article

A Simple and Non-destructive Method of Direct-PCR for Plant Systems

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages 114-122

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12374-011-9191-6

Keywords

Direct-PCR; DNA extraction; Multiplex PCR

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To date, PCR is a fundamental tool for most of the research concerning plant diversity analysis, marker-assisted selection, genetic purity testing, disease diagnostics, and transgene analysis. In all of these analyses, good-quality DNA serves as a template for amplification of target sequences. Extraction of good-quality DNA requires many steps, making the whole process time consuming, tedious, labor intensive, and expensive due to costlier and toxic chemicals. To overcome these preparatory steps from PCR-based DNA amplification, we have developed a direct-PCR amplification method for plants without isolating DNA. The method is unique and beneficial over some previously described methods of direct-PCR which fail due to inefficient amplification of target DNA in the presence of PCR inhibitors and crop specificity. Moreover, such methods are non-specific and, being destructive, cannot be replicated; one cannot completely rely on them due to lack of reproducibility. This method was streamlined from our earlier observation that alcohol-desiccated tissues maintain intact DNA for a long time. This method is specific, rapid, and, being non-destructive, allows replication, giving advantages over existing methods. The method was tested over a wide range of plant species and found very effective and quick in generating data. The method was successfully used to test the genetic purity of pearl millet hybrid (RHB-127) and its restorer (RIB 3135-18) and CMS line (ICMA 93333A). Our method is especially important for developing inexpensive and high-throughput non-invasive genetic analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available