4.3 Article

Structure, abundance and biomass size spectra of copepods and other zooplankton communities in upper waters of the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean during summer

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 610-629

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbt014

Keywords

size structure; copepods; zooplankton; Southwestern Atlantic; normalized biomass size spectra

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  2. Instituto Antartico Argentino-Direccion Nacional del Antartico [ANPCyT PICT 7-9108, IAA-DNA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little attention has been paid to small copepods and other zooplankton inhabiting pelagic ecosystems of the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean under the influence of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current circulation, despite their important role in the trophic chain and fisheries. This study gives a synoptic view (January 2001) of the micro and mesoplankton size fractions and normalized biomass size spectra (NBSS) in upper waters of five different ecological domains (shelf and oceanic Subantarctic and Antarctic waters) including the BrazilMalvinas confluence (BMC). Copepods were always the main component of the zooplankton; the 300-m fraction represented between 70 and 99 in terms of numbers and from 20 to 88 in terms of biomass. Other zooplankton contributed with 40 to total zooplankton densities, though showing some biomass peaks (50). Chlorophyll a, sea surface temperature and salinity were the environmental variables that best explained the distribution trend of zooplankton, mainly that of the 300-m fraction. For all the domains, NBSS revealed flat slopes (0.6 to 1), suggesting a higher proportion of large organisms than expected at equilibrium. A dome-shape feature was detected in the BMC. Total biomass and trophic levels of the system were related to the composition of the community and the hydrological conditions of the domains covered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available