4.3 Article

Variability in northwards extension of warm water copepods in the NE Pacific

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH
Volume 33, Issue 11, Pages 1643-1653

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbr065

Keywords

continuous plankton recorder; Northeast Pacific; copepods

Funding

  1. consortium for the North Pacific CPR survey
  2. NERC [SAH01001, NE/I030062/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I030062/1, SAH01001] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Continuous Plankton Recorder has been deployed in the NE Pacific on two intersecting transects since 2000. Many deployments included a temperature sensor providing in situ temperature data to supplement the species abundance data for similar to 1300 samples. Twenty-nine copepod taxa were sufficiently abundant to examine their temperature-related distributions. Groups of warm- and cold-water species were identified, with overlapping distributions between 48 and 58 degrees N. Recent fluctuations in ocean climate, from the warmest year on record in 2005 to one of the coldest in decades in 2008, provided ideal conditions to observe temperature-related interannual variability. The abundance and northwards extension of warm water species were significantly positively correlated with mean annual temperature and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. The cold water species showed no correlations with temperature/Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) within the study region; however, if the 4 years of sampling that extended south to 39 degrees N were examined separately, there was a strong relationship between temperature/PDO and the southern extent of subarctic copepods. Under warm ocean conditions, the range overlap of the two groups will increase as warm water species extend northwards, causing an increase in copepod diversity. Since warm water species are generally smaller and nutritionally poorer, this has implications for higher trophic levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available