4.6 Article

Human cerebrospinal fluid increases the excitability of pyramidal neurons in the in vitro brain slice

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 593, Issue 1, Pages 231-243

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.284711

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [K2013 - 12600, K2010 - 63P-21562-01-4, K2011 - 61X-20401-05-6]
  2. Swedish State Support for Clinical Research [ALFGBG-136991, ALFGBG-144341]
  3. Swedish Brain Foundation [FO2011-003]
  4. Swedish Alzheimer Association [13-03-076]
  5. Wolfson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composition of brain extracellular fluid is shaped by a continuous exchange of substances between the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid. The CSF is known to contain a wide range of endogenous neuromodulatory substances, but their collective influence on neuronal activity has been poorly investigated. We show here that replacing artificial CSF (aCSF), routinely used for perfusion of brain slices in vitro, with human CSF (hCSF) powerfully boosts spontaneous firing of CA1, CA3 and layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the rat brain slice. CA1 pyramidal neurons in hCSF display lowered firing thresholds, more depolarized resting membrane potentials and reduced input resistance, mimicking properties of pyramidal neurons recorded in vivo. The increased excitability of CA1 pyramidal neurons was completely occluded by intracellular application of GTPS, suggesting that endogenous neuromodulators in hCSF act on G-protein coupled receptors to enhance excitability. We found no increase in spontaneous inhibitory synaptic transmission by hCSF, indicating a differential effect on glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. Our findings highlight a previously unknown function of the CSF in promoting spontaneous excitatory activity, and may help to explain differences observed in the activity of pyramidal neurons recorded in vivo and in vitro.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available