4.6 Review

Synchronization and desynchronization in epilepsy: controversies and hypotheses

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 591, Issue 4, Pages 787-797

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.239590

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Czech Ministry of Health [IGA NT/11460-4]
  2. Epilepsy Research UK [P1102]
  3. MRC [G0802162]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [SNF320030 122010]
  5. NIH [1R01EB014641-01]
  6. US-German Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience (CRCNS)
  7. Medical Research Council [G0802162]
  8. MRC [G0802162] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Epilepsy Research UK [F0806, P1102] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [G0802162] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epilepsy has been historically seen as a functional brain disorder associated with excessive synchronization of large neuronal populations leading to a hypersynchronous state. Recent evidence showed that epileptiform phenomena, particularly seizures, result from complex interactions between neuronal networks characterized by heterogeneity of neuronal firing and dynamical evolution of synchronization. Desynchronization is often observed preceding seizures or during their early stages; in contrast, high levels of synchronization observed towards the end of seizures may facilitate termination. In this review we discuss cellular and network mechanisms responsible for such complex changes in synchronization. Recent work has identified cell-type-specific inhibitory and excitatory interactions, the dichotomy between neuronal firing and the non-local measurement of local field potentials distant to that firing, and the reflection of the neuronal dark matter problem in non-firing neurons active in seizures. These recent advances have challenged long-established views and are leading to a more rigorous and realistic understanding of the pathophysiology of epilepsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available