4.6 Article

Relationship between physiological measures of excitability and levels of glutamate and GABA in the human motor cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 589, Issue 23, Pages 5845-5855

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.216978

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CIBM of the UNIL
  2. EPFL
  3. IUNIGE
  4. HUG
  5. CHUV
  6. Jeantet foundation
  7. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Council
  8. Wellcome Trust
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  10. European Union [223524]
  11. Medical Research Council
  12. International Brain Research Organization
  13. Leenaard foundation
  14. BBSRC [BB/F02424X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F02424X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Non-technical summary Inter-individual differences in regional GABA as assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) relate to behavioural variation in humans. However, it is not clear what the relationship is between MRS measures of the concentration of neurotransmitters in a region and synaptic activity. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) techniques provide physiological measures of cortical excitation or inhibition. Here, we investigated the relationship between MRS and TMS measures of glutamatergic and GABAergic activity within the same individuals. We demonstrated a relationship between MRS-assessed glutamate levels and a TMS measure of global cortical excitability, suggesting that MRS measures of glutamate do reflect glutamatergic activity. However, there was no clear relationship between MRS-assessed GABA levels and TMS measures of synaptic GABAA or GABAB activity. A relationship was found between MRS-assessed GABA and a TMS protocol with less clearly understood physiological underpinnings. We speculate that this protocol may therefore reflect extrasynaptic GABA tone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available