4.6 Article

Transmural variation in myosin heavy chain isoform expression modulates the timing of myocardial force generation in porcine left ventricle

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 586, Issue 21, Pages 5203-5214

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.160390

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL61635]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown that the sequence and timing of mechanical activation of myocardium vary across the ventricular wall. However, the contributions of variable expression of myofilament protein isoforms in mediating the timing of myocardial activation in ventricular systole are not well understood. To assess the functional consequences of transmural differences in myofilament protein expression, we studied the dynamic mechanical properties of multicellular skinned preparations isolated from the sub-endocardial and sub-epicardial regions of the porcine ventricular midwall. Compared to endocardial fibres, epicardial fibres exhibited significantly faster rates of stretch activation and force redevelopment (k(tr)), although the amount of force produced at a given [Ca2+] was not significantly different. Consistent with these results, SDS-PAGE analysis revealed significantly elevated expression of alpha myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform in epicardial fibres (13 +/- 1%) versus endocardial fibres (3 +/- 1%). Linear regression analysis revealed that the apparent rates of delayed force development and force decay following stretch correlated with MHC isoform expression (r(2) = 0.80 and r(2) = 0.73, respectively, P < 0.05). No differences in the relative abundance or phosphorylation status of other myofilament proteins were detected. These data show that transmural differences in MHC isoform expression contribute to regional differences in dynamic mechanical function of porcine left ventricles, which in turn modulate the timing of force generation across the ventricular wall and work production during systole.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available