4.1 Article

Dimethyl amiloride, a Na+-H+ exchange inhibitor, and its cardioprotective effects in hemorrhagic shock in in vivo resuscitated rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages 175-180

Publisher

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s12576-009-0024-z

Keywords

Hemorrhage; Rat; Isolated heart; Contractility; Dimethyl amiloride; Calcium; Sodium; Lactate; pH; Langendorff

Categories

Funding

  1. College of Medicine Research Center, King Saud University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stimulation of the Na(+)-H(+) exchanger plays an important role in the pathway of myocardial dysfunction and injury following hemorrhagic shock. Inhibition of the Na(+)-H(+) exchanger appears to be a new pharmacological tool for myocardial protection. Despite the extensive research that has been done on the role of the Na(+)-H(+) exchanger in ischemia reperfusion, little is known about the role of the exchanger following hemorrhagic shock. The purpose of this study was to examine the protective effects of blocking the cardiac Na(+)-H(+) exchanger, using 20 mu M dimethyl amiloride (DMA), a specific Na(+)-H(+) exchanger blocker, on myocardial contractile function after ex vivo perfusion of isolated rat heart following 1 h of hemorrhagic shock. Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to hemorrhage + DMA, hemorrhage, sham hemorrhage + DMA and sham hemorrhage groups (n = 6 per group). Hearts were perfused with a balanced salt solution for 60 min. In the DMA treated group, 20 mu M DMA was added for the first 5 min of the 60-min ex vivo heart resuscitation. The results showed that inhibition of the Na(+)-H(+) exchanger for 5 min on ex vivo perfusion of the isolated hearts following hemorrhagic shock using 20 mu M DMA improved myocardial contractile function. Blocking the Na(+)-H(+) exchanger on ex vivo perfusion of isolated hearts using 20 mu M DMA has protective effects on myocardial contractile function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available