4.5 Article

Reactive force field potential for carbon deposition on silicon surfaces

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 24, Issue 39, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/39/395004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Fund, Luxembourg [C09/MS/15]
  2. Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission (FP7-COFUND)
  3. Center for Scientific Computing in Espoo, Finland
  4. Academy of Finland-MATERA+ project DESTIMP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper a new interatomic potential based on the Kieffer force field and designed to perform molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of carbon deposition on silicon surfaces is implemented. This potential is a third-order reactive force field that includes a dynamic charge transfer and allows for the formation and breaking of bonds. The parameters for Si-C and C-C interactions are optimized using a genetic algorithm. The quality of the potential is tested on its ability to model silicon carbide and diamond physical properties as well as the formation energies of point defects. Furthermore, MD simulations of carbon deposition on reconstructed (100) silicon surfaces are carried out and compared to similar simulations using a Tersoff-like bond order potential. Simulations with both potentials produce similar results showing the ability to extend the use of the Kieffer potential to deposition studies. The investigation reveals the presence of a channelling effect when depositing the carbon at 45 degrees incidence angle. This effect is due to channels running in directions symmetrically equivalent to the (110) direction. The channelling is observed to a lesser extent for carbon atoms with 30 degrees and 60 degrees incidence angles relative to the surface normal. On a pristine silicon surface, sticking coefficients were found to vary between 100 and 73%, depending on deposition conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available