4.6 Article

Investigation of the effects of myocardial anisotropy for shear wave elastography using impulsive force and harmonic vibration

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 365-382

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/365

Keywords

anisotropy; transverse isotropy; shear wave; frequency; myocardium

Funding

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) [R01EB002167]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  3. American Heart Association (AHA) [14POST20000009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The myocardium is known to be an anisotropic medium where the muscle fiber orientation changes through the thickness of the wall. Shear wave elastography methods use propagating waves which are measured by ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to characterize the mechanical properties of various tissues. Ultrasound- or MR-based methods have been used and the excitation frequency ranges for these various methods cover a large range from 24-500 Hz. Some of the ultrasound-based methods have been shown to be able to estimate the fiber direction. We constructed a model with layers of elastic, transversely isotropic materials that were oriented at different angles to simulate the heart wall in systole and diastole. We investigated the effect of frequency on the wave propagation and the estimation of fiber direction and wave speeds in the different layers of the assembled models. We found that waves propagating at low frequencies such as 30 or 50 Hz showed low sensitivity to the fiber direction but also had substantial bias in estimating the wave speeds in the layers. Using waves with higher frequency content (>200 Hz) allowed for more accurate fiber direction and wave speed estimation. These results have particular relevance for MR-and ultrasound-based elastography applications in the heart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available